I think what the issue is is that it seems you popped out of nowhere to pick at something, but, well, you haven't really told me where I was wrong, just that something else would 'work just as well'. Which doesn't say I was 'inaccurate' at all, just that there's another way to accomplish the same thing. Which is what is currently confusing me.
In other words, if you would like to explain how to do it right, I'd be interested to hear your ideas. Because I would hate to think your intent really was to burst my half-assed science bubble (which again, I warned for in the beginning so it's not like I was crowing about my mastery of science and needed to get cut down for my monstrous ego, ya know?)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-09-30 02:04 pm (UTC)In other words, if you would like to explain how to do it right, I'd be interested to hear your ideas. Because I would hate to think your intent really was to burst my half-assed science bubble (which again, I warned for in the beginning so it's not like I was crowing about my mastery of science and needed to get cut down for my monstrous ego, ya know?)